Magnetic resonance imaging does not appear to help patients slated for epidural steroid injections (ESI) for chronic lower back pain, and has only a minor effect on the physician’s decision making, according to a study published online this week by the Archives of Internal Medicine.
Magnetic resonance imaging does not appear to help patients slated for epidural steroid injections (ESI) for chronic lower back pain, and has only a minor effect on the physician’s decision making, according to a study published online this week by the Archives of Internal Medicine.
Lower back pain is the world’s leading cause of disability, and one of the top three reasons people seek medical attention, according to the report by a team led by Steven P. Cohen, MD, of The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.
Despite several studies demonstrating that advanced radiology does not improve outcomes in patients with lower back pain - with or without symptoms such as nerve irritation causing pain shooting down the back of the leg - the use of MRI in this context continues to soar, Cohen and colleagues wrote.
“The lack of unequivocal guidelines on the use of MRI before ESI is somewhat unexpected, considering that ESI is the most frequently performed procedure in pain clinics throughout the United States,” they wrote.
The team conducted a multicenter randomized study in which the treating physician in group 1 patients was blinded to the MRI results, while the physician for group 2 patients decided on the treatment after reviewing the MRI findings. For the patients in group 1, an independent physician proposed a treatment plan after reviewing the MRI, and that plan was compared to the treatment the patient actually received. A total of 132 patients (average age 52, of whom 34 percent were taking painkillers) were randomized into the two groups. Group 1 patients all received ESIs. Not all patients in group 2 received ESIs, if the MRI finding did not support that treatment, at which point the patients exited the study.
A month later, group 2 had slightly lower pain scores than the MRI-blinded patients in group 1. But the differences had evaporated at three months, the researchers reported.
“In conclusion,” the authors wrote, “our results suggest that although MRI may have a minor effect on decision making, it is unlikely to avert a procedure, diminish complications, or improve outcomes. Considering how frequently ESIs are performed, not routinely ordering an MRI before a lumbosacral ESI may save significant time and resources.”
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
The Reading Room Podcast: A Closer Look at Remote MRI Safety, Part 2
July 25th 2025In the second of a multi-part podcast episode, Emanuel Kanal, M.D. and Tobias Gilk, MRSO, MRSE, share their perspectives on remote MRI safety protocols for ensuring screening accuracy and adherence to conditional implant guidelines as well as a rapid and effective response to adverse events.
Study Reveals Significant Prevalence of Abnormal PET/MRI and Dual-Energy CT Findings with Long Covid
July 22nd 2025In a prospective study involving nearly 100 patients with Long Covid, 57 percent of patients had PET/MRI abnormalities and 90 percent of the cohort had abnormalities on dual-energy CT scans.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current and Emerging Insights on Abbreviated Breast MRI, Part 2
July 23rd 2025In the second part of a multi-part podcast episode, Stamatia Destounis, MD, Emily Conant, MD and Habib Rahbar, MD, discuss key sequences for abbreviated breast MRI and how it stacks up to other breast cancer screening modalities.
Stroke MRI Study Assesses Impact of Motion Artifacts Upon AI and Radiologist Lesion Detection
July 16th 2025Noting a 7.4 percent incidence of motion artifacts on brain MRI scans for suspected stroke patients, the authors of a new study found that motion artifacts can reduce radiologist and AI accuracy for detecting hemorrhagic lesions.