Few radiologists are rated on physician-rating websites.
Radiologists are often rated favorably on physician-rating websites, but they are significantly underrepresented compared with nonradiologists, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
Researchers from Emory University in Atlanta, GA, and the Neiman Health Policy Institute, in Reston, VA, sought to assess the level of radiologist representation on popular physician-rating websites.
The researchers randomly selected 1,000 self-designated diagnostic radiologists and manually extracted their rating information from five popular online physician-review websites:
• HealthGrades
• Healthcare Reviews
• RateMDs
• Kudzu
• Yelp
The results showed that only 197 radiologists (19.7%) were profiled on any of the five online physician-review websites. Twenty-four (2.4%) were rated on two sites, and none were profiled on three or more. They also found that of all 6,775 physicians listed on a single electronically interrogated site, only 30 (0.4%) were radiologists.[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"41629","attributes":{"alt":"","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_1371417916810","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"4419","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"height: 267px; width: 200px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px; float: right;","title":"©Andrei Marincas/Shutterstock.com","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
“With 28,555 (5.2 percent) of all 547,849 Medicare-participating physicians identified as diagnostic radiologists, radiologists were thus significantly underrepresented online,” the authors wrote. “Although reviewed radiologists and nonradiologists were rated online by similar numbers of patients (1.13 ± 0.43 versus 1.03 ± 0.22, P = .22), radiologists were rated (on a low to high score of 1 to 10) significantly higher than nonradiologists (median 8.5 versus 5, P = .04).”
The researchers concluded that while radiologists were often rated highly on these rating websites when they were reviewed, they were severely underrepresented compared with other physicians. “Given the potential for patient satisfaction scores and public domain information to affect referrals and future value-based payments, initiatives to enhance radiologists’ online presence are advised,” they wrote.
A Victory for Radiology: New CMS Proposal Would Provide Coverage of CT Colonography in 2025
July 12th 2024In newly issued proposals addressing changes to coverage for Medicare services in 2025, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced its intent to provide coverage of computed tomography colonography (CTC) for Medicare beneficiaries in 2025.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.
New Study Shows Non-Radiologists Interpreting 28 Percent of Imaging for Medicare Patients
June 28th 2024While radiologists interpreted approximately 99 percent of all non-cardiac CT, MRI and nuclear medicine studies in hospital and emergency department settings for Medicare beneficiaries, new research shows significantly less radiologist review of cardiac imaging and office-based imaging.