Register Now: Image-Based Risk: The Next Frontier in Breast Cancer Screening
|Articles|December 1, 2006

Study: Inexpensive Dell monitor works for radiography

A consumer-grade monitor made by Dell Computers may be sufficient for interpreting radiography images, one of radiology's most demanding applications, according to a presentation at the RSNA meeting on Thursday.

A consumer-grade monitor made by Dell Computers may be sufficient for interpreting radiography images, one of radiology's most demanding applications, according to a presentation at the RSNA meeting on Thursday.

The Dell 2405 color monitor is as bright as medical-grade monitors but costs 10 times less, said Dr. David Hirschorn, who researched the monitor at Massachusetts General Hospital. It is gradually finding its way into radiology as an alternative to more expensive medical monitors, he added.

Previous research studies by Hirschorn concluded that consumer-grade LCD monitors are sufficient for reviewing "small matrix" ultrasound, CT, and MR images. But the subtle findings on "large matrix" radiography are more visually demanding and pose an additional challenge. Radiography images represent about 70% of imaging's workload.

The Dell monitor is set for a lower brightness right out of the box but can be made brighter for watching DVD's from a greater distance than is commonly used in workstation computing, Hirschorn said.

To test whether the Dell monitor would be suitable for radiography, the researchers selected 121 radiography exams; 30 of which previously interpreted as normal and 93 as abnormal. The abnormal images were chosen for subtle positive findings.

All of the studies were reviewed by two board certified radiologists on a pair of Dell 2405 displays first, and the findings recorded with conspicuity grades for each exam. One month later the same exams were reviewed in random order by the same radiologists on a pair of 3 megapixel gray-scale medical-grade monitors. Both displays were calibrated to the DICOM standard.

The results: The medical grade and the Dell consumer monitors produced the same findings in 117 of 121 cases. Two fractures and one kidney stone were seen on the gray-scale monitors but not seen on the Dell 2405s. In 11 cases other findings that were seen on the Dell 2405s were not seen on the grayscales. The differences were not of statistical clinical significance.

"These results don't prove that you can use this display, but there is a good chance to believe this is probably reasonable," Hirschorn said. "In practice a lot of radiologists use this setup and are comfortable using this system for primary interpretation of radiography."

Related to this article

See the Real-World Impact of AI in Radiology
AI has to do more than show potential. It has to deliver measurable results.The Rad AI Outcomes and Market Impact Compendium brings together real-world clinical, operational and financial evidence from health systems, academic medical centers and radiology practices using Rad AI Reporting, Impressions and Continuity.Explore results including 60+ minutes saved per radiologist shift, a 47% reduction in report error rates, 70%+ patient follow-up adherence and >7x ROI — plus, case studies showing how organizations are translating AI into greater capacity, quality and financial performance.See what AI built specifically for radiology can deliver in practice.