In the emergency department, those lacking health insurance receive less imaging than those covered. But once admitted as inpatients, they’re treated equally from the diagnostic imaging perspective, according to two studies published in the January 2012 edition of the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
In the emergency department, those lacking health insurance receive less imaging than those covered. But once admitted as inpatients, they’re treated equally from the diagnostic imaging perspective, according to two studies published in the January 2012 edition of the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
Kimberly Applegate, MD, an Emory University Medical Center radiologist, and James Moser, PhD, of Econometrica, delivered both studies.
In the first study, related to radiology orders from emergency departments (ED), the researchers used 2004 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey as input. They found that, compared with insured persons, nonelderly uninsured ED patients received 8 percent fewer services and Medicaid ED patients received 10 percent fewer services. They found similar results for the value of imaging services received (13 percent and 19 percent less, respectively).
“These results suggest that insurance status influences how much imaging and the intensity of imaging patients receive,” said Applegate. “Whether insured patients receive unnecessary imaging or uninsured and Medicaid patients receive too little imaging is not clear.”
The second study, considering radiology use in the inpatient setting, was based on 2003 National Hospital Discharge Survey data.
Just over 9 percent of inpatients were uninsured, according to the data, and those who underwent imaging received the same average number of imaging services (1.51) of the same average value as those for comparable insured persons. The uninsured received fewer interventional and image-guided procedures, but more CT studies than insured patients, Applegate and Moser found.
“Because insurance status does not seem to significantly influence the quantity or value of imaging services received by hospital inpatients, efforts to assist uninsured patients with imaging needs would be better directed elsewhere than the hospital inpatient setting,” Applegate said.
A Victory for Radiology: New CMS Proposal Would Provide Coverage of CT Colonography in 2025
July 12th 2024In newly issued proposals addressing changes to coverage for Medicare services in 2025, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced its intent to provide coverage of computed tomography colonography (CTC) for Medicare beneficiaries in 2025.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.
New Study Shows Non-Radiologists Interpreting 28 Percent of Imaging for Medicare Patients
June 28th 2024While radiologists interpreted approximately 99 percent of all non-cardiac CT, MRI and nuclear medicine studies in hospital and emergency department settings for Medicare beneficiaries, new research shows significantly less radiologist review of cardiac imaging and office-based imaging.