The largest study to date comparing film-screen and full-field digital mammography found the digital approach better for visualizing microcalcifications deemed crucial to diagnosing ductal carcinoma in situ.
The largest study to date comparing film-screen and full-field digital mammography found the digital approach better for visualizing microcalcifications deemed crucial to diagnosing ductal carcinoma in situ.
Dr. Nico Karssemeijer from Radboud University in Nijmegen, the Netherlands, and colleagues evaluated 367,600 screening exams performed over five years, 56,518 of which were digital. Breast cancer was found in 1927 women, 317 of whom underwent digital mammography enhanced with computer-aided diagnosis.
At initial screenings, digital detected cancer at a rate of 0.77% and film at a rate of 0.62%. Subsequent readings led to rates of 0.55% and 0.49%, respectively, for digital and film. Film-based screening detection of DCIS was 0.12% in initial exams and 0.08% in subsequent exams. Digital mammography DCIS detection was 0.22% in initial exams and 0.12% in subsequent exams (Radiol 2009 July 31 e-pub ahead of print).
Mammography and Breast MRI: Is it Time to Evaluate Strategies as Opposed to Modalities?
July 5th 2024The combination of mammography with breast MRI within 90 days had a 96.2 percent sensitivity in comparison to 48.1 percent for mammography and 79.7 percent for breast MRI performed within 91 to 270 days after index mammography, according to newly published research.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.