I recently completed a task that we expect will lead to a more refined search engine for the Diagnostic Imaging Web site and those of our sister publications at CMPMedica. The project required perusing some 400-plus articles in the radiology literature from the past 30 years, covering every conceivable subcategory, and tagging those that best define each clinical application and modality. It involved some tedious parsing of wheat from chaff but provided ample opportunity for reflection on how far radiology has come.
I recently completed a task that we expect will lead to a more refined search engine for the Diagnostic Imaging Web site and those of our sister publications at CMPMedica. The project required perusing some 400-plus articles in the radiology literature from the past 30 years, covering every conceivable subcategory, and tagging those that best define each clinical application and modality. It involved some tedious parsing of wheat from chaff but provided ample opportunity for reflection on how far radiology has come.
Sifting through the abstracts prompted a bit of nostalgia. Since the mid-1970s, radiologists and vendors have discovered, investigated, and ultimately rejected multiple technologies and applications in their quest for the best. Xeromammography, dedicated rotational angiography, and biliary lithotripsy are all techniques that fell into the dustbin of history.
In addition to clinical practice, radiology vernacular has also evolved over the years. We no longer refer to "nuclear magnetic resonance" or "water-bath ultrasound." But some things don't change. Turf wars, self-referred imaging, and the goal of obtaining better reimbursement for services rendered were hot topics yesterday and remain so today. Just update the players (from chiropractors to cardiologists) and the applications (from in-office x-ray to self-referred CT angiography); the concerns and frustrations stay the same.
During this, the RSNA meeting season, when radiologists are deluged by new product introductions and applications research, it seems pertinent to reflect on the technologies that have come and gone, as well as those that have endured. In the past year, we've inked articles about diffusion-weighted MR for stroke, a new breast CT device, and SPECT/CT versus PET/CT. I wonder which of these we'll still be writing about in 30 years.
-Ms. Dakins is copy chief of Diagnostic Imaging.
FDA Clears Virtually Helium-Free 1.5T MRI System from Siemens Healthineers
June 26th 2025Offering a cost- and resource-saving DryCool magnet technology, the Magnetom Flow.Ace MRI system reportedly requires 0.7 liters of liquid helium for cooling over the lifetime of the device in contrast to over 1,000 liters commonly utilized with conventional MRI platforms.
Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography be a Viable Screening Alternative to Breast MRI?
June 17th 2025While the addition of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) led to over a 13 percent increase in false positive cases, researchers also noted over double the cancer yield per 1,000 women in comparison to DBT alone.
Multinational Study Reaffirms Value of Adjunctive AI for Prostate MRI
June 16th 2025The use of adjunctive AI in biparametric prostate MRI exams led to 3.3 percent and 3.4 percent increases in the AUC and specificity, respectively, for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in a 360-person cohort drawn from 53 facilities.
How to Successfully Launch a CCTA Program at Your Hospital or Practice
June 11th 2025Emphasizing increasing recognition of the capability of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the evaluation of acute and stable chest pain, this author defuses common misperceptions and reviews key considerations for implementation of a CCTA program.