Not everyone is convinced cumulative radiation dose exists, or even that repeat CT scans cause cancer.
Not everyone is convinced cumulative radiation dose exists, or even that repeat CT scans cause cancer. There has never been any scientific data to prove there is a cumulative effect for somebody who gets scanned once a year, according to Richard Morin, Ph.D., chair of the American College of Radiology's safety committee.
“There is no radiation biology to demonstrate CTs are additive in any way,” said Morin, who is also a professor of radiologic physics at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, FL.
Morin likened receiving multiple CT scans to keeping a log of the miles one drives every day. There's a certain probability of getting into an accident, but does that mean there will be an accident when a certain number of miles is driven? It's not as though when a person reaches an arbitrary threshold-say, 200 miles-then something bad will happen. Cancer is much more complex than that, he said.
“I think what we have here is an education issue,” Morin said. “This whole idea of a cumulative radiation effect is terminology that should not be used because there isn't something like that.”
Additionally, there's no generally accepted method for determining cumulative dose. Chest x-rays can't be added to head CTs to come up with one number that's the total amount of radiation, he said. They just don't add together.
While it is known ionizing radiation at high levels produces cancer, there is no way to figure out whether a person contracted cancer because of ionizing radiation, a carcinogen, or random chance, Morin said. The pathology will look the same.
“There's nothing specific about a cancer produced by ionizing radiation that's different than one produced by any other agent,” he said. “In fact, if you take a look at the ability to produce mutations, ionizing radiation is actually quite a weak mutagen, much weaker than benzene and some of the other known carcinogens.”
Still, CT scans should not be ordered willy-nilly, Morin said. It's important the right test is ordered at the right time and computerized order entry/decision support aids that process. If a patient received 20 CT scans in a month, somebody ought to look at that and ask why. But it's important not to scare the public when it comes to radiation dose.
“We don't want patients running around adding up numbers and then turning down exams that would otherwise be life-saving,” he said.
A Victory for Radiology: New CMS Proposal Would Provide Coverage of CT Colonography in 2025
July 12th 2024In newly issued proposals addressing changes to coverage for Medicare services in 2025, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced its intent to provide coverage of computed tomography colonography (CTC) for Medicare beneficiaries in 2025.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.
New Study Shows Non-Radiologists Interpreting 28 Percent of Imaging for Medicare Patients
June 28th 2024While radiologists interpreted approximately 99 percent of all non-cardiac CT, MRI and nuclear medicine studies in hospital and emergency department settings for Medicare beneficiaries, new research shows significantly less radiologist review of cardiac imaging and office-based imaging.